Why Hillary Clinton was NOT elected President
Yesterday the NYT wrote about Barack Obama
navigating the slippery slope of giving well-paid speeches (he gets up to $400,000 per speech) while avoiding the impression of selling out his status as
a former president of the United States of America. This made me think again
about the motivation pyramid I had described in “Swarm Leadership”, from money,
power, glory, and love, to enlightenment. Derived from Maslow’s pyramid,
it occurred to me that there is an additional "status" layer. Barack Obama can translate his high status as former President of the US into money, by charging enormous speaking fees,
however he has to be extremely careful not to reduce his status by giving the
impression of cashing in. We can observe
this effect on all layers of the motivation pyramid, which in its revised format looks now as follows.
The boundary between financial and social capital is highly permeable. Wealthy people can buy higher status as so-called philanthropists by donating some of their wealth to charitable causes. On the other hand people high on social capital can convert their power and glory into financial capital. Politicians can use their positions of power to enrich themselves by selling jobs to their cronies and taking bribes. Actors, musicians, and athletes can use their glory to promote brands and products, charging hefty fees for their endorsements. And highly respected political and religious leaders can use their high-status positions to solicit donations to their organizations and themselves. However if they are too aggressive in converting their social capital to financial capital, they lose their social capital. The most admired high-status leaders lead comparatively modest lives that ordinary people can relate to. Pope Francis is one of the most globally respected leaders because he moved out of the Papal palaces into an unpretentious apartment and drives around in a Fiat instead of a stretch Mercedes car. And Barack Obama is very careful to only give paid speeches that are associated with the societal goals that he has been championing during his presidency, such as the healthcare reform.
And that leads me to the failure of Hillary Clinton to capture the US Presidency during the 2016 elections. She was highly successful in converting her position of power as the wife of a US President, Senator of New York, and US Secretary of State into high status, and then using this high status to give highly paid speeches, amassing a large fortune in the process. Unfortunately this association with financial institutions widely seen as the culprits of the 2008 financial crisis destroyed her social capital, thus making her an undesirable president for large parts of the US population.
The picture above also illustrates that there are two ways to obtain high status: either through power and glory like Roger Federer or Barack Obama, or through enlightenment, by creating a sense of belonging, and helping others. The Dalai Lama, and open source leaders like Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, Jimmy Wales, creator of Wikipedia, and Tim Berners-Lee, creator of the Web, have all been working on a cause greater than themselves, giving up the direct way to status through power and glory, only to reach even higher status as the creators of these invaluable new technologies that have truly changed the way how we live, think, and act.
The boundary between financial and social capital is highly permeable. Wealthy people can buy higher status as so-called philanthropists by donating some of their wealth to charitable causes. On the other hand people high on social capital can convert their power and glory into financial capital. Politicians can use their positions of power to enrich themselves by selling jobs to their cronies and taking bribes. Actors, musicians, and athletes can use their glory to promote brands and products, charging hefty fees for their endorsements. And highly respected political and religious leaders can use their high-status positions to solicit donations to their organizations and themselves. However if they are too aggressive in converting their social capital to financial capital, they lose their social capital. The most admired high-status leaders lead comparatively modest lives that ordinary people can relate to. Pope Francis is one of the most globally respected leaders because he moved out of the Papal palaces into an unpretentious apartment and drives around in a Fiat instead of a stretch Mercedes car. And Barack Obama is very careful to only give paid speeches that are associated with the societal goals that he has been championing during his presidency, such as the healthcare reform.
And that leads me to the failure of Hillary Clinton to capture the US Presidency during the 2016 elections. She was highly successful in converting her position of power as the wife of a US President, Senator of New York, and US Secretary of State into high status, and then using this high status to give highly paid speeches, amassing a large fortune in the process. Unfortunately this association with financial institutions widely seen as the culprits of the 2008 financial crisis destroyed her social capital, thus making her an undesirable president for large parts of the US population.
The picture above also illustrates that there are two ways to obtain high status: either through power and glory like Roger Federer or Barack Obama, or through enlightenment, by creating a sense of belonging, and helping others. The Dalai Lama, and open source leaders like Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, Jimmy Wales, creator of Wikipedia, and Tim Berners-Lee, creator of the Web, have all been working on a cause greater than themselves, giving up the direct way to status through power and glory, only to reach even higher status as the creators of these invaluable new technologies that have truly changed the way how we live, think, and act.
Comments
Post a Comment