Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Swarm Creativity to Explore Outer Space
Yesterday I learned from Rod Dunne about his Science Fiction novel "Terra Swarm" which extrapolates how swarms of scouting spacecraft could search the cosmos in search of habitable planets, forming hives as they go. COIN's form the backdrop for the concepts for a story about deep space explorers and their feelings of liberty within such a swarm.
A great read...
Labels:
science fiction,
swarm creativity
Reaktionen: |
Friday, November 16, 2012
Cool COIN Movie from Chile!
When I was in Chile in August 2012 at the invitation of good friend Cristobal Garcia, "Do Future Andes 2012 " a great movie about the future of Swarmcreativity and COINs in Chile was produced. Besides the discussion of the benefits of creative swarms I also find the Chilean nature stunningly beautiful.
Labels:
Chile,
COIN,
Portillo,
Sewell,
swarmcreativity
Reaktionen: |
Tuesday, November 06, 2012
Last Minute Election Analysis in Ohio and Florida
As everybody knows, today the next President of the United States gets elected. Common wisdom says that it's the swing states such as Florida and Ohio that will decide the outcome of the race. Rohan Kulkarni, who has already done a really nice job analyzing the outcome of the Vice Presidential debate between Ryan and Biden, has looked more closely at what voters in Ohio and Florida have to say about Obama and Romney. Here is his blog post.
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Joe Biden and Paul Ryan: Pre and Post Debate
I would like to start by thanking Peter for inviting me to write this
post on the Swarm Creativity blog. I have been in Peter’s COINs class for over
a month now and I am thoroughly fascinated by what social network analysis can
teach us.
For the COINs class’ midterm exam that involves gathering, analyzing and
inferring from social media data, I was assigned the topic “Joe Biden against
Paul Ryan”. It was a great topic for me since I was planning on doing
some coolhunting on this topic after the Vice Presidential debate that evening.
Conducting the analysis before the debate made the results even more
interesting. I have used Condor’s Twitter Collector to collect Twitter feeds
and Condor Web Collector’s Google Blog Search to collect website data. Here are
the results, pre and post-debate.
Pre-Debate Analysis
Twitter
Following image shows the network of users talking about Paul Ryan and Joe Biden on Twitter. The blue dots are users talking about Joe Biden, the green are talking about Paul Ryan and the red are talking about both of them.
We can see that there are more people talking about Paul Ryan compared to those talking about Joe Biden. The following image shows that the betweenness centrality (or popularity) of Paul Ryan is much greater than that of Joe Biden.
Now let us see what people are actually talking about. Following image shows the terms widely used by users while talking about Joe Biden.

We can see that “Obama”, “Ryan”
and “tonight” are quite important (or have higher “betweenness centralities” in
SNA terminology). This is expected. However, the interesting terms that appear
with a decent amount of betweenness centrality are “win” and “good”.
Now let us see what terms are being used by people
talking about Paul Ryan.Here also, we can see that “Joe”, “Biden” and “tonight” have high betweenness centralities. Interestingly, although the term “good” appears with high betweenness centrality, just as it did in Joe Biden’s network, the term “win” appears with a very low betweenness. Could this mean that although fewer people are talking about Joe Biden, they are talking more optimistically about him?
To go a little deeper, I used Condor’s Taxo tool to further analyze the twitter feeds. I extracted terms from 3 wikipedia categories
1) Emotion
2) Economics
3) Employment
Following image shows the terms from these taxonomies that appear in tweets about Joe Biden.
The interesting terms that appear
with high frequency are “hope”, “shame” and “economics”.
Following image shows the terms from these taxonomies that appear in tweets about Paul Ryan
The interesting terms that appear
with high frequency are “economics”, “employment”, “hope”, “motivation” and
“victory”.
Although Joe Biden’s taxonomy
view doesn’t look too conclusive, Paul Ryan’s view seems very positive.
Moreover his betweeness centrality is also high on twitter. Thus I can say that
Paul Ryan is clearly more popular on twitter and positively so.
Google Blog Search
Now let us look at the google
blog search results.
Following image shows the network of websites talking about Joe Biden and Paul Ryan. The blue dots are websites talking about Biden, the green are talking about Ryan and red are talking about both.
Following image shows the betweenness centralities for Paul Ryan and Joe Biden.
Clearly Joe Biden is more central
in blogs. This is different from twitter, where Ryan was more central.
We can see that
huffingtonpost.com is the most influential website in the blog search, followed
by foxnewsinsider.com.
Joe Biden’s sentiment view:
We see a lot of positive
sentiment for Joe Biden.
Ryan’s sentiment view looks quite
balanced and is not very skewed towards positive, unlike Biden’s, which is
clearly positive.
Conclusions:
1) Twitter
analysis shows Paul Ryan to be clearly more popular and positive
2) Blog analysis shows that Joe Biden is more popular and positive
3) Since twitter is more dynamic than blogs, I would conclude that Joe Biden has a historical positive sentiment going for him, but Ryan is the new and popular kid on the block.
4) We need to keep an eye on huffingtonpost.com and foxnewsinsider.com to see what they are saying about the 2 candidates. What they say is clearly very influential
2) Blog analysis shows that Joe Biden is more popular and positive
3) Since twitter is more dynamic than blogs, I would conclude that Joe Biden has a historical positive sentiment going for him, but Ryan is the new and popular kid on the block.
4) We need to keep an eye on huffingtonpost.com and foxnewsinsider.com to see what they are saying about the 2 candidates. What they say is clearly very influential
Post-Debate Analysis
Twitter
The twitter feeds after the
debate were collected every hour from the time the debate ended at about
10:30PM EDT till the next morning. This was done so as to be able to see the
change in the betweenness centralities of the two candidates over the few hours
after the debate.
The following image shows the network of users
talking about Joe Biden and Paul Ryan after the debate.
The blue dots are users talking
about Joe Biden, the green are users talking about Paul Ryan and the red dots
are users talking about both the candidates. Unlike the pre-debate view, we can
see a much larger fraction of people is talking about Joe Biden after the
debate.
The following image shows the betweenness
centralities of the 2 candidates.
Joe Biden is in fact more central
post-debate than he was before the debate. This does not tell the complete
story though. Let’s analyze the content of the tweets to figure out what people
are actually saying about the 2 candidates.
In addition to the obvious
“tonight”, “Obama” and “vice” we see the terms “rude” and “laughing” being used
a lot. These terms do indicate a bit of negativity in the tweets about Biden.
After the debate, Joe Biden was criticized quite a bit for his condescending
and rude demeanor during the debate.
There is nothing that really
stands out that may be attributed to a positive or negative tone in the tweets
about Paul Ryan.
We can see a surge in Joe Biden’s
centrality for some time after the debate. However, Paul Ryan does catch up and
finally surpass Joe Biden in centrality in due course of time. This indicates
that more people did talk about Biden for some time after the debate, but went
back to talking about Ryan soon. Moreover, the analysis of terms shows that
quite a bit of the talk about Biden might have been negative.
Google Blog Search
We see that Joe Biden and Paul
Ryan have comparable betweenness centralities, unlike the view before the
debate. Paul Ryan definitely seems to have gained some ground in the blog
space. Now let us look at the sentiment analysis of the content in the
websites.
Biden’s sentiment view is still
quite positive but it does seem to have lost some positive sentiment.
Paul Ryan's Sentiment View:
Paul Ryan’s sentiment view is
clearly positive now, unlike the one before the debate.
huffingtonpost.com
is once again the most influential website. However, foxnewsinsider.com seems
to have disappeared after the debate.
Conclusions:
Here
are some conclusions based on the analysis after the debate
1) People
spoke about Joe Biden a lot more on twitter after the debate than they did
before the debate
2) The content of tweets about Joe Biden might have had some negative tone.
3) Websites spoke more about Paul Ryan after the debate than they did before the debate
4) The sentiment analysis of the content on blogs shows an increase in positive sentiment for Paul Ryan and a slight decrease in positive sentiment for Joe Biden
5) The website to keep an eye on for news on these two candidates in huffingtonpost.com
6) Paul Ryan certainly seems to be the winner in terms of likability of the only Vice Presidential debate in this race to the White House. However, what effect the debate has had on their electability and consequently that of the presidential candidates is a coolhunting task in itself
2) The content of tweets about Joe Biden might have had some negative tone.
3) Websites spoke more about Paul Ryan after the debate than they did before the debate
4) The sentiment analysis of the content on blogs shows an increase in positive sentiment for Paul Ryan and a slight decrease in positive sentiment for Joe Biden
5) The website to keep an eye on for news on these two candidates in huffingtonpost.com
6) Paul Ryan certainly seems to be the winner in terms of likability of the only Vice Presidential debate in this race to the White House. However, what effect the debate has had on their electability and consequently that of the presidential candidates is a coolhunting task in itself
I
am now looking forward to the next coolhunting task that I plan to undertake.
The analysis of the second Presidential debate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)