The fairest Country on Earth?

Today’s Swiss Newspaper Tagesanzeiger showed statistics published in a paper in the Swiss Economic Journal in 2011 which show that a person in Switzerland who has an income - well below the poverty level - of Swiss Franc 12,100 (=USD 13,000 at today’s exchange rate) gets supplemental income of CHF 54,700 by the Swiss state. In fact, with totally CHF 66,800 this person gets more money to spend than a middle class earner making 58,800 Swiss Francs, who pays CHF 7200 taxes with a net income of CHF 51,600.



Even somebody who makes 100,000 Swiss Francs per year has less money left after taxes to spend than the person on welfare with the 12,100 income.
While there is a lively discussion ongoing – the article quickly triggered hundreds of comments - at least for now, nobody seems to fundamentally question the basic mechanisms of redistribution.
   
It also seems to work to the benefit of the overall Swiss population. In most of the world happiness rankings, the Swiss rank near the top (#2 on the Legatum ranking, #3 on the UN World Happiness Report).  If we take life expectancy as the final metric of individual health and happiness, Switzerland is also doing very well, #7 on the most recent WHO ranking, and #1 in an OECD ranking.

Why?

I think one critical point is that there are other criteria besides money contributing to health and happiness. People with low socioeconomic status (the welfare recipients in Switzerland) get supplements by the state to compensate for the stress and frustration in their low paying part-time jobs; many of them will also collect disability benefits as a large part of their supplement. It is impossible to make that little money for a full job, as the minimum wage is about 36,000 Swiss Francs per year, which will then be complemented by the state to the 54,000 Francs listed above.
The effect of these compensatory payments is that everybody has enough money to life in dignity.  

And people making the least might need a little more to compensate for their stress and frustrations compared to middle income earners.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Predicting Stock Market Indicators Through Twitter “I hope it is not as bad as I fear”

Image
We have been working on trying to predict market indicators for quite some time by analyzing Web Buzz , predicting who will win an Oscar, or how well movies do at the box office . Among other things we have correlated posts about a stock on Yahoo Finance and Motley’s Fool with the actual stock price, predicting the closing price of the stock on the next day based on what people say today on Yahoo Finance, on the Web and Blogs about a stock title. The rising popularity of twitter gives us a new great way of capturing the collective mind up to the last minute. In our current project we analyze the positive and negative mood of the masses on twitter, comparing it with broad stock market indices such as Dow Jones, S&P 500, and NASDAQ. We collected the twitter feeds from one whitelisted IP for six months from March 30, 2009 to Sept 4, 2009, ranging from 5680 to 42820 tweets per day. According to twitter this corresponds to a randomized subsample of about one hundredth of the full volum...
Read more

My life in Alternative Realities - fatherlanders and nerds don’t go well together

Image
We are all living in different alternative realities, people with different personalities see reality from very different perspectives, potentially leading to a lot of friction and misunderstandings. “Nerds” are open to change, they believe in the progress of technology and innovation. “Fatherlanders” abhor change, they like tradition and authority, valuing the fatherland above all, and would like to reestablish the good old times. “Spiritualists” believe into supernatural forces, they are religious, meditate and hope that the forces of nature will heal their ailing. “Treehuggers” believe into sustainability and global warming, they want to save nature by restricting technical progress. I experience  this friction frequently in my daily life. As a computer and technology nerd with spiritualist and treehugger inclinations, my communication with members from other tribes sometimes does not end well.  My interactions with officers of the US Department of Homeland Security and the...
Read more

How Blind Trust in Generative AI Undermines Creative Work

Image
This summer, we experienced firsthand the damage caused by blind faith in the "superhuman" capabilities of generative AI, even among otherwise intelligent individuals. Here's what happened. We submitted a research paper to an academic conference, and after it was accepted, I paid the registration fee, booked flights, and arranged accommodations. A week later, we received an abrupt email from the organizers stating that our paper had been rejected. The reason? Their AI-based plagiarism and ChatGPT-detection tool flagged it as containing both plagiarized content and text generated by ChatGPT. This accusation was entirely unfounded. Our paper presented highly original work by our team, proposing novel AI algorithms to predict animal emotions—a concept never explored before. We detailed the development of an AI model to validate this approach, something completely unique to our research. By its very nature, it was impossible for our work to be plagiarized or generated by Chat...
Read more